Replies: 1 comment
-
If a DNS response returns the |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Output of the following commands:
./dnscrypt-proxy -version
2.1.1
./dnscrypt-proxy -check
nothing show
./dnscrypt-proxy -resolve example.com
What is affected by this bug?
I'm not sure this is a bug, let me describe the problem,I want to use IP white list, dnscrypt-proxy only works with the IP I specify, so I refer to "example-allowed-ips.txt" format, create a file call "allowed-ips.txt"
looks like this:
I put this settings under config file, dnscrypt-proxy.toml,
and I see this file already loaded in "service dnscrypt-proxy status"
=============
Is the allowed-ips.txt means, only 123.123.0.1 - 123.123.0.5 and 127.0.0.1,can use dnscrypt-proxy udp port 53?
Am I understanding wrong?
but when this txt loaded, I try to use another VPS, IP such as,234.234.0.1 / 234.234.0.2, use dig & nslookup, test the dnscrypt-proxy udp port 53, it can successfully resolve the domain name
and I under openresolver.com,test my dnscrypt-proxy server IP,it show this error "Open recursive resolver detected on XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX",
that's mean, my dnscrypt-proxy udp 53, can be able to attacked by DNS Amplification Attacks
When does this occur?
Always
Where does it happen?
dnscrypt-proxy server
Expected behavior (i.e. solution)
If I understand the purpose of allowed-ips.txt correctly, I hope that only the IPs in "allowed-ips.txt" can use my dnscrypt-proxy udp:53, make a whitelist effect
If I understand wrong, the purpose of allowed-ips.txt is not what I thought, please also tell me what its purpose is? I don't understand the description of the documentation
thanks
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions