Replies: 2 comments
-
The UI often uses different APIs than what are published and made available for API clients to use. PSFalcon doesn't have any control over the schema being used in the API endpoint itself. Unless PSFalcon is manipulating the query that gets sent (check with verbose output enabled), you'd have to refer this to CrowdStrike support. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Agreed - PSFalcon isn't the culprit here. I initially discovered the problem in n8n and toggled over to PSFalcon to validate (and so that Support wouldn't get "distracted" by the other vendor/product name). I already have a case open - will pursue that angle, asking why this one field wouldn't be API-accessible. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
While developing a GraphQL query in the UI editor,
https://falcon.crowdstrike.com/id-protection/ui-api/data-model-service/graphql
I discovered that the UI editor has some slight differences in schema vs the API endpoint used by PSFalcon
https://api.crowdstrike.com/identity-protection/combined/graphql/v1
Is this a bug?
To repro:
Issue this query in the UI editor
Set variables to match the entities from one of these alert types: [DailyVolumeAnomalyAlert, DailyTargetVolumeAnomalyAlert]}
Expected behavior
I would have expected identical query results, but the API endpoint returns an HTTP 400 with:
Additional context
Powershell script to demonstrate the issue in context:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions