New Features Discussion

[saksham-gera]

Discussion For New Features To be discussed.

[saksham-gera]

Hi @pradeeban ,

I'm Searching For Bugs, But In the meantime, Do You Have Any Feature Ideas in mind, or does the concore team want any? I would be so happy to implement that feature.

[pradeeban]

Hi @saksham-gera
A little challenging task here for you.
NISYSLAB/DHGWorkflow@main...KathiraveluLab:DHGWorkflow:main
See the above diff. There, I have reverted the sharing feature on server, implemented by our very first GSoC student on CONTROL-CORE. I believe my rationale was it was not properly tested and was failing on certain situations. It was 2021. So my memories are vague. Can you look into it and see how to revive this sharing feature, especially that it is actually something we want to support!

It can be a time-consuming task - so, no pressure.

[saksham-gera]

Sure Sir, it would be a great honor for me, I'll Will Look Into It.
And Will update you by tomorrow.

Thanks

[pradeeban]

Sounds good, have a good night. :)

[pradeeban]

Also, just to clarify, when you "revive" this feature, just send the fixes to https://github.com/ControlCore-Project/concore-editor/ (and not to any of its upstream repositories. All the upstream repositories are either frozen or archived).

[saksham-gera]

Hi @pradeeban ,
I've updated my proposal with minor changes, like adding a reference for the research paper I've researched in the research section and some minor changes to increase understandability.

Please check one last time since I don't want any risk about the organization's rules or policies for the proposal at this stage, and there are only 2 days left.

[saksham-gera]

@pradeeban sir,

Can you please explain the sharing feature a bit more. As I can see in the comparing changes link you provided, you reverted mainly the Toastify code. Are you talking about the crud_http.js file?

also if you can explain a little more on what is the expected behavior of these functions??

[saksham-gera]

Hi @pradeeban , could you please create a new branch with the name VCS for this feature? Since it will require multiple iterations to implement perfectly, I would prefer to continue contributing to that branch. This will help maintain steady progress in parallel without causing much conflict with the development of other features.

[pradeeban]

@saksham-gera, makes sense. I have created the branch "VCS" from dev.

[saksham-gera]

Thanks Sir, Will soon create the first PR in this direction.

[saksham-gera]

@pradeeban ,
Just an update that i've implemented VCS for source Nodes too, but it is currently working for local system only, since i've not integrated cloud storage yet, but will soon find the most optimal storage solution for this too, and implement the same.

Will soon create a PR for this too after testing.

[pradeeban]

@saksham-gera sounds great! Let's see how it evolves. Thanks.