-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
New regional example for the ACC #142
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
The error that I get is copied below.
|
what if you use the CPU and start julia with |
Thanks @simone-silvestri for the suggestion. Will try it now. |
Things go a lot further but there is a problem with the lines that defines It seems this is with
|
@simone-silvestri , any advice on what is going wrong here? |
It looks like there is a bug in the |
Thanks @simone-silvestri , I will give that a try! |
Make changes so that it runs
@simone-silvestri : I tried it and it seems like a function is not defined. I added this at the beginning and now it seems to be running!
|
Ah nice. I think we can export that type. |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #142 +/- ##
=====================================
Coverage 0.00% 0.00%
=====================================
Files 34 34
Lines 1962 1983 +21
=====================================
- Misses 1962 1983 +21 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
It's running on a CPU (i.e. slow) and still on the initial time step. I made all these changes on the branch and can revert back to what we had previously as other fixes come along. Maybe I'll have something to share tomorrow. |
I started the job yesterday and it hasn't updated the output files in over 24 hours. I think something has gone wrong. Below is the currently display that I have. It hasn't stopped and still running on a CPU. Maybe we need to try it on a GPU or have more output to see what has gone wrong? Any suggestions?
|
My correction. It is still running on one CPU. It is at 4 days after 7 days of computing. Not a great ratio. What needs to be done so we need to do to run this on a GPU? @simone-silvestri |
Wow, that seems quite slow! What if you move it on the GPU? |
Sorry @simone-silvestri for the late reply. I am happy to try it again on a GPU but last time there was an error. I can try it again and let you know what the error is. |
@simone-silvestri
|
I stand corrected, there is more information. To me this actually looks very different even.
|
Can you make an MWE for this and open an issue? |
I will certainly give it a try and see what part of it is causing the issue. This will likely take me a day or two to get to. |
@simone-silvestri , I realize it's been a few months but I am still keen to this this example up and running. I can try this all again this week but if you had time to meet for an hour, I wonder if that would help? |
Sure, I ll text on slack. |
Would noon Boston time work for you? I can also do earlier or later if you prefer. |
Make sure to only use ECCCO4Monthly, should remove numerical instabilities we were getting with ECCO2Daily.
…r real this time)
Problem is with the forcing in the northern region. See #556. |
Purpose
Following up on #106, this is a first attempt to create a regional model with ECCO-derived restoring at the boundaries. We decided to try focusing on the ACC in the southern ocean.
To-do
It does not run yet, but after it does, it would be good to know if people agree this is a good example to include. If yes, then we need to turn this into an example.
Content
This is the only file that is different from main at the moment.
https://github.com/CliMA/ClimaOcean.jl/blob/fjp/acc_regional_model/examples/acc_regional_simulation.jl