Replies: 2 comments
-
On further investigation, as far as I can tell LiteLLM is behaving as expected |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Hey @tseruga were you able to resolve your issue? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Read through the changes made in #8843 but it's not immediately obvious to me whether or not reasoning content is expected to work via the proxy server for calls made to Claude 3.7 to Bedrock with thinking enabled.
It appears that the thinking parameter is respected, but the responses from the proxy server never contain the reasoning/thinking content.
provider_specific_fields
is alsoNone
which I know was discussed as a location where these reasoning blocks might appear while a generalized solution was worked on.I know this model is brand new, but just wanted to make sure I understood where the effort currently stood - and that I'm not wildly misunderstanding things.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions