Replies: 3 comments 1 reply
-
|
I've certainly been pondering separating the library into more discrete units. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
The most extreme approach whould be to make it even optional at compilation stage, letting the user to choose at the CMAKE file. For me that is preffered. I'll take a deeper look later. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
BTW, if you want others to make PR, you are risking having your code changed by contributers formatters, that are different than yours. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I think it would be cleaner to move all the double parts of the library to a different header.
I for example, do not use ClipperD, so for me it makes more sense.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions