Q 31 - Return type of Constructor #35
-
Why doesn’t a constructor have a return type ? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 2 comments
-
A constructor in Java doesn’t have a return type — not even 🧠 Conceptual Reason
🛠️ Exampleclass Car {
Car() {
// Constructor: no return type
System.out.println("Car object created");
}
void Car() {
// Regular method: has a return type
System.out.println("This is not a constructor");
}
} In this example:
🔍 JVM BehaviorThe Java Virtual Machine (JVM) uses constructors to allocate memory and set up the object. It doesn’t expect a return value from the constructor because the object reference is returned by the |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
🧠 Because it implicitly returns the instance of the class itself. Its role is to prepare the object, not return a value. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
A constructor in Java doesn’t have a return type — not even
void
— and here’s why, based on both programming principles and the context from the discussion you’re viewing:🧠 Conceptual Reason
Purpose of a Constructor: Its sole job is to initialize a new object of a class. It’s automatically called when an object is created using the
new
keyword.Implicit Return: Although it doesn’t have a return type, it implicitly returns the instance of the class being constructed. This return is handled by the JVM, not by the constructor itself.
Syntax Rule: If you declare a return type (even
void
), the method is treated as a regular method — not a constructor.🛠️ Example