Project Management

[genidma]

Hi there.

I'd be really interested to see the implementation for the purpose of project management in particular.

• I've deployed Clickup for a number of years now. Still on the fence about investing in additional $7 (US) per month in order to implement AI as part of subscription. https://clickup.com/ai. There is content that I can share publicly and would like to port over to another system. And porting it over and then managing the work effort is where Computer Use could play a pivotal role. Well, I am biased here. But outside of the scope of project management, clearly there is unlimited potential.

I would pay for a feature, where I can:

• Make targeted prompts via the following methods (with a condition for both):
• Text based prompts
• Voice based
• • Condition: Guided prompts for both (above).
• • • The agent(s) was/were thinking of solving the problem:
• • • • Focusing on the utility and user interface and not the underlying code necessarily.
• • • Here is what I would actually would like and prefer.
• • • • To accomplish the above mentioned, an undo feature can be implemented in variations.
• • • • • As well, the implementation could be augmented with mermaid graphs The mechanism would generate a crisp and succinct diagram of what it is 'thinking' of implementing, before it actually goes about implementing it.
• For all prompts, simple snapshots actions (captured in sequences) performed within a finite time-range (this is relative without invoking or summoning Einstein ;) ) are key. So that, someone like me (who, at the moment) is not equipped to either access or make sense out of what the underlying LLMS e.t.c are doing. UML, within reason, one can wrap their mind around.

From my limited perspective:

• Computer use at-least in an Engelbart sense (Source: Mother of all Demo via Youtube is bound by the finite range of the real-estate.
• • The agent or agents designed for computer-use must focus on that utility. Getting the same agents to parse data, make sense out of the data e.t.c must not be the focus. So really, the proposition is to focus on the niche that is being identified.
• • • There are exceptions to this point, in the sense that if you code, then computer use is not limited to the range of pixels directly in front of you. And seeing that the evolution of intelligence that is independent of a substrate can help equip more individuals to interact with machine-based intelligence, without the need to master programming languages.
• • Virtual reality, in a finite command center type range (only) is also on topic. Same with AR (Augmented Reality).
• Specific research out of DeepMind comes to mind here.

Source illustrations via mermaidchart.com

• https://www.mermaidchart.com/raw/fb5276b8-f4dc-41d5-bdd4-232b775df998?theme=light&version=v0.1&format=svg
• High-level UML overview of what I have sought to capture in this post. Generated automatically via the same source as above.

I am happy to hop on a call to discuss. https://cal.com/singularityisnear

Thank you & enjoy the holidays!

[genidma]

Here is a creative commons image of the late Bill English. A co-collaborator of Doug Engelbart.

I found out about the late Bill English when I was doing a search on the late Mr. Engelbart.

Here is an article via BBC that begins to capture how the invention of the GUI (Graphical User Interface) came about. https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-53638033

Going with the surface level timeless. English already had a fairly developed design.

• If Jobs visited PARC in 1979, then the designs were already there for at-least 11 years (1968). It looks like the design of the mouse goes back to 1963. So 16 years the design had been sitting there. If I did the math right.
• • Source 01 - via StanfordU
• • Source 02 via Wikipedia: link

Imagine:

• How many pioneering designs must be sitting on the research labs in a lot of different areas. All over the world.
• • How this research could be licensed equitably, in a fair manner and leveraging a higher form of ethics. How many issues could be resolved in a meaningful manner and the lives that will be improved. Not to forget the wealth that the activities will generate in a meaningful manner.
• Imagine, how our reality could transform. If we did a really good job of enabling and equipping the next Frederick Terman

Something to think about.

Thanks for reading!