Strange link to RFC2119 at the end of the second graph in the Conformance section

[wantehchang]

In the Conformance section, the second paragraph ends with a link to "RFC2119", after the period of the last sentence of the paragraph. It looks like the following:

All of the text of this specification is normative except sections explicitly marked as non-normative, examples, and notes. [RFC2119]

So that "RFC2119" link looks extraneous.

I don't know the source of the Conformance section. I cannot find it in the index.bs file.

[leo-barnes]

It's automatically generated by Bikeshed. The text looks like this at the moment:

Conformance requirements are expressed with a combination of descriptive assertions and RFC 2119 terminology. The key words “MUST”, “MUST NOT”, “REQUIRED”, “SHALL”, “SHALL NOT”, “SHOULD”, “SHOULD NOT”, “RECOMMENDED”, “MAY”, and “OPTIONAL” in the normative parts of this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119. However, for readability, these words do not appear in all uppercase letters in this specification.

All of the text of this specification is normative except sections explicitly marked as non-normative, examples, and notes. [[RFC2119]](https://aomediacodec.github.io/av1-avif/#biblio-rfc2119)

I think it would be better if the first mention of RFC 2119 had the link instead of having it extraneously at the end, but I think this is something that would need tweaking by Bikeshed.

I'll mark this as editorial and non-blocking. Nice if we can fix it.

[leo-barnes]

Filed speced/bikeshed#2942