You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm interested in running a 2D RZ coordinate simulation where the boundary conditions are R_hi = Inflow/Outflow, Z_lo/Z_hi = Periodic. From my understanding, the remaining boundary condition R_lo (the centerline of the cylinder) is required to be "Symmetry" when running in RZ. However, I'm interested in having this boundary condition act as a source/sink instead, which doesn't appear to be built-in functionality. Two approaches I've (only briefly) considered are 1) adding a source term to the points right next to the R_lo boundary or 2) digging into the Symmetry requirement to ultimately remove it and implement Inflow/Outflow for the R_lo boundary. I'd appreciate any insight from anyone who is more familiar with the code or has given this some thought. Is either method preferred? Is there a better method? Is this perhaps already possible?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hello,
I'm interested in running a 2D RZ coordinate simulation where the boundary conditions are R_hi = Inflow/Outflow, Z_lo/Z_hi = Periodic. From my understanding, the remaining boundary condition R_lo (the centerline of the cylinder) is required to be "Symmetry" when running in RZ. However, I'm interested in having this boundary condition act as a source/sink instead, which doesn't appear to be built-in functionality. Two approaches I've (only briefly) considered are 1) adding a source term to the points right next to the R_lo boundary or 2) digging into the Symmetry requirement to ultimately remove it and implement Inflow/Outflow for the R_lo boundary. I'd appreciate any insight from anyone who is more familiar with the code or has given this some thought. Is either method preferred? Is there a better method? Is this perhaps already possible?
Thanks!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions