Skip to content

Size of the git repo is too important #18

@FAMILIAR-project

Description

@FAMILIAR-project

Almost 200Mb, despite the fact that it's only a few Mb!

After a fresh git clone, I get:

dn026168:tuxart macher1$ du -h .
1.2M	./tuxart/examples
616K	./tuxart/sources/sprays
640K	./tuxart/sources
1.8M	./tuxart
 20K	./bin
592K	./dist
178M	./.git/objects/pack
  0B	./.git/objects/info
178M	./.git/objects
4.0K	./.git/info
4.0K	./.git/logs/refs/heads
4.0K	./.git/logs/refs/remotes/origin
4.0K	./.git/logs/refs/remotes
8.0K	./.git/logs/refs
 12K	./.git/logs
 48K	./.git/hooks
4.0K	./.git/refs/heads
  0B	./.git/refs/tags
4.0K	./.git/refs/remotes/origin
4.0K	./.git/refs/remotes
8.0K	./.git/refs
178M	./.git
180M	.

so .git seems responsible.
Is it due to the history?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions